Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationPre-deposit On Penalty Only In Appeal Notified w.e.f. 01.10.2025

Pre-deposit On Penalty Only In Appeal Notified w.e.f. 01.10.2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified that the Section 128, 129 and 130 of the Finance Act, 2025 (7 of 2025) which pertains to the pre-deposit for filing an appeal, Penalty for non-compliance of Track and Trade Mechanism for certain goods, and Track & Trace Mechanism respectively will be effective from 01/10/2025.

Presently, as per Section Section 129 of the Finance Act, 2025 (7 of 2025) or Section 107 of the CGST Act the taxpayers were required to make a pre-deposit of 25% of the penalty only in cases where the penalty was imposed under Section 129(3) (detention, seizure, and release of goods and conveyances in transit). For penalties under other provisions, no pre-deposit was required.

However, from 01/10/2025, a uniform 10% pre-deposit of the penalty amount will apply in all penalty appeals, regardless of the provision under which the penalty has been levied.

The law was silent on pre-deposit in cases where the dispute pertained only to penalties. But from 01.10.2025) uniform 10% pre-deposit of the penalty amount has now been prescribed for appeals before the Tribunal.

Notification Details

Notification No. 16/2025–Central Tax

Date: 17/09/2025

Read More: Consolidated SCN Covering Multiple Financial Year Permissible In GST Fraud Cases: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

More like this

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...