Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLASupreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in ED Case; Orders Accused to Surrender...

Supreme Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail in ED Case; Orders Accused to Surrender for Completion of Probe, Chargesheet Filing

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has cancelled the anticipatory bail on Anil Tuteja who was involved in ED case and ordered the accused to surrender for completion of probe and chargesheet filing.

The bench of Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma granted custody of respondent – Anil Tuteja to the appellant – ED for a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the condition that he shall cooperate with the appellant – ED so as to facilitate it to complete the investigation and file the complaint. Respondent – Anil Tuteja is granted one week’s time to surrender.

The bench stated that after the investigation is complete respondent – Anil Tuteja and respondent – Alok Shukla shall be released, if not required in any other case, subject to the terms and conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court.

The ED has challenged the anticipatory bail granted to respondent – Anil Tuteja and respondent – Alok Shukla.

Case Details

Case Title: ED Versus Anil Tuteja

Case No.: Criminal Appeal Nos . 4097 -4098 /2025

Date:  SEPTEMBER 16, 2025

Read More: ICAI Issues Revised Schedule for Postponed CA Exams in Kathmandu, Nepal

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 2, 2026.GSTCAN GST CONFISCATION PROCEEDINGS BE...

Business Purpose Alone Can’t Secure GST Credit: GSTAT Upholds ITC Disallowance For Lack Of Evidence

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad Bench, has upheld the disallowance...

Annual Return Errors Can’t Defeat ITC Protected By Retrospective S. 16(5): GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has set...

Marriage Reaches ‘Dead End’: SC Grants Divorce Granted With ₹35 Lakh Alimony

The Supreme Court has dissolved a marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 of...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 2, 2026.GSTCAN GST CONFISCATION PROCEEDINGS BE...

Business Purpose Alone Can’t Secure GST Credit: GSTAT Upholds ITC Disallowance For Lack Of Evidence

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad Bench, has upheld the disallowance...

Annual Return Errors Can’t Defeat ITC Protected By Retrospective S. 16(5): GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has set...