Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST56th GST Council: Intermediary Concept Omitted From Section 13(8) of IGST Act 

56th GST Council: Intermediary Concept Omitted From Section 13(8) of IGST Act 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant move aimed at boosting India’s services exports, the 56th GST Council meeting chaired by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has recommended a key amendment in the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017.

The Council has proposed the omission of clause (b) of Section 13(8) of the IGST Act, which presently determines the place of supply for intermediary services as the location of the service provider. Once the amendment takes effect, the place of supply for such services will instead be determined under the default rule of Section 13(2) of the IGST Act — i.e., the location of the recipient of services.

This change will effectively treat intermediary services provided by Indian entities to overseas clients as “exports of services,” making them eligible for export-related benefits, including zero-rated tax treatment.

Industry experts and exporters have long demanded this reform, as the existing provision created tax disadvantages for Indian intermediaries providing services to foreign clients. The reform is expected to remove ambiguities and bring India in line with global tax practices.

Speaking after the meeting, officials highlighted that this step is a part of the government’s broader vision to simplify GST provisions and strengthen India’s position as a global hub for services.

The proposed amendment will come into force after the necessary legislative changes are carried out in Parliament.

Read More: Next-Gen GST Reform: Car Prices to Drop as Tax Reduced from 28% to 18%

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...

Govt. Funding Doesn’t Establish Eligibility For 12% GST On Spinning Mill Construction: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Pune Bench, has upheld 18% GST...

More like this

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...