Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTJharkhand High Court Grants Bail to Trader Accused in Rs. 27.5 Crore...

Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail to Trader Accused in Rs. 27.5 Crore GST Evasion Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi comprising the bench of Justice Ambuj Nath has granted bail to Gulbahar Malik, proprietor of Ranchi Trading Co., who was arrested in connection with an alleged Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion case amounting to Rs. 27.52 crore.

The case, registered as Complaint Case No. 2933 of 2025, arose from a Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) investigation under File No. DGGI/INTL/1465/2024-GRC. Malik was accused of setting up multiple fake firms to fraudulently evade taxes between the financial year 2021 and 2025.

The petitioner argued that he had already been in judicial custody for over two months. They further submitted that while the charges were serious, the maximum prescribed punishment under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), and 132(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, was five years of imprisonment, and the prosecution report along with the charge sheet had already been filed.

Opposing the bail, DGGI, contended that the accused had orchestrated a large-scale tax evasion scheme by floating shell entities. However, acknowledging the length of custody and the stage of proceedings, the court ruled in favour of bail.

The High Court directed Malik’s release on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Economic Offence Court, Jamshedpur.

Case Details

Case Title: Gulbahar Malik Versus Union of India

Case No.: B.A. No. 7327 of 2025

Date: 27.08.2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: P.A.S.Pati, Advocate

Read More: India-US Tariff War | US Signals Compromise: ‘Will Come Together With India’ 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Higher Exam Marks Can’t Cure Missing Essential Qualification: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that higher marks in a recruitment examination cannot compensate...

ED Can Continue Money Laundering Probe After Filing Complaint Without Prior Court Permission Before Charges Are Framed: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a petition challenging further investigation by the Enforcement...

No Pre-Deposit For Disputed GST Interest-Only Appeal; Customer’s Non-Payment Can’t Stop Interest Liability: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that an...

More like this

Higher Exam Marks Can’t Cure Missing Essential Qualification: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that higher marks in a recruitment examination cannot compensate...

ED Can Continue Money Laundering Probe After Filing Complaint Without Prior Court Permission Before Charges Are Framed: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a petition challenging further investigation by the Enforcement...