Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsPast Contributions Not a Free Pass: Women Lawyers Slam Justice Katju Over...

Past Contributions Not a Free Pass: Women Lawyers Slam Justice Katju Over Remark

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association (SCWLA) has strongly condemned former Supreme Court judge Justice Markandey Katju for a recent remark deemed “inappropriate and belittling” toward women in the legal profession.

In a letter addressed to Justice Katju, SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani, Senior Advocate, and General Secretary Prernaa Singh acknowledged Katju’s past contributions to women’s causes during his judicial tenure, but emphasized that “intent and impact are not the same.” The association noted that while Katju may not have intended harm, his words carried weight due to his stature, and their effect was to trivialize the struggles of women lawyers.

“A comment of that nature, even if said in a lighter vein, trivializes women and reinforces stereotypes they have long struggled to overcome,” the letter stated. It further warned that such remarks risk undermining women’s credibility and professionalism in a field where they already face prejudice.

The association stressed that “past contributions, however valuable, do not give anyone a free pass for present insensitivity,” adding that genuine respect for women is demonstrated not just through institutional measures, but also through language, conduct, and sensitivity.

Acknowledging Katju’s apology, SCWLA urged reflection without justification and accountability without deflection. “Your ‘joke’ should not be seen as a license for other men holding Constitutional posts to follow, belittle women or undermine their intellectual status, integrity and professionalism,” the letter concluded.

The statement underscores ongoing concerns about gender bias and professional dignity in India’s legal community, highlighting the continued struggle of women lawyers to be recognized and respected on equal footing with their male counterparts.

Read More: Delhi High Court Refuses Quash Penalty Against GST Consultant Involved In Rs. 285-Crore Fake ITC Scam

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...