Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Modifies Stray Dog Order, Allows Release After Vaccination and Deworming

Supreme Court Modifies Stray Dog Order, Allows Release After Vaccination and Deworming

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court on Friday eased its earlier directions on stray dogs in Delhi-NCR, permitting their release back into localities after vaccination, deworming and sterilisation, while strictly prohibiting street feeding.

A three-judge Bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria modified its August 11 order that had mandated the capture of all stray dogs and barred their return from shelters.

“The prohibition on release of strays shall remain. They shall be dewormed, vaccinated etc., and released back to the same area,” the Bench ruled. However, dogs found to be rabid or displaying aggressive behaviour will not be returned to public spaces.

Street Feeding Banned; Dedicated Zones to Be Created

The Court directed municipal bodies to set up designated feeding zones in every ward, equipped with boards clearly notifying that feeding will only be permitted in these areas. Public feeding of strays on streets has been strictly disallowed, with violators facing penal action.

“Municipal authorities shall forthwith commence an exercise for creating dedicated feeding spaces … Under no conditions shall the feeding of stray dogs on the street be permitted,” the order stated.

Additionally, all municipal bodies must establish a dedicated helpline to allow citizens to report violations.

Costs Imposed on Petitioners

In a move aimed at discouraging frivolous interventions, the Court directed individual dog lovers and NGOs who have approached it to deposit ₹25,000 and ₹2 lakh, respectively, within seven days. Non-compliance will bar them from further participation in the matter.

National Policy in the Making

The Court also expanded the case’s scope beyond Delhi-NCR by impleading all States and Union Territories as parties. It said it would hear the matter in detail to evolve a uniform national policy on stray dog management, and transferred all similar cases pending before various High Courts to itself.

Key Directions at a Glance

  • Stray dogs to be released after vaccination, sterilisation, and deworming;
  • Rabid or aggressive dogs not to be released;
  • No street feeding allowed; feeding only in designated spaces;
  • Municipalities to create dedicated helplines;
  • Animal rights activists barred from obstructing civic bodies;
  • Dog lovers and NGOs to deposit ₹25,000 and ₹2 lakh respectively;
  • Adopted dogs cannot be abandoned back on the streets;
  • Court to draft a national policy after consulting all States/UTs.

Background

On August 11, a different Bench of the Supreme Court had ordered the immediate capture of stray dogs across Delhi, with shelters to be set up for at least 5,000 animals within eight weeks. That order prohibited re-release of strays and required strict sterilisation, vaccination, and 24/7 helplines to handle complaints.

The order, prompted by rising dog bite cases – over 25,000 reported in Delhi in 2024 and more than 3,000 in January 2025 alone – sparked intense protests from animal rights activists.

Concerns over overlapping stray dog proceedings before different Supreme Court Benches led Chief Justice of India BR Gavai to consolidate the matter before the present Bench, which has now issued fresh directions and reserved its order for a wider policy framework.

Case Details

Case Title: City Hounded By Strays, Kids Pay Price

Case No.: SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO(S). 5 OF 2025

Date: AUGUST 22, 2025

Read More: Interest on Delayed Duty Payment Not Refundable Under GST Transitional Provisions: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...

CBDT Revises Valuer and Income-tax Practitioner Forms, Extends Key Deadlines

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the Income-tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules,...

More like this

Management, Technical Services Rendered From China Not Taxable as FTS Under India-China DTAA: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payments...

CGST Corruption Case: Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Advocate After 9 Months in Custody

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has granted bail to 70-year-old advocate Naresh Kumar...

CBDT Removes Arrest Provision for Tax Recovery

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has amended the Income-tax Rules, 2026, bringing...