In a decisive move aimed at addressing the growing threat posed by stray dogs, the Supreme Court on Monday directed civic authorities to remove all stray dogs from residential areas and relocate them to designated shelters. The court warned that any individual or organisation obstructing the exercise would face the “strictest possible” action, including contempt proceedings.
The directive comes amid a surge in dog bite incidents and rabies-related deaths across the country — a matter the bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan took up after noting media reports highlighting the crisis. The court said it would hear the Centre’s submissions on the issue but would not entertain petitions from animal rights groups or private individuals opposing the removal drive.
“This is not for us — it is for the public interest. Sentiments should not override public safety,” Justice Pardiwala remarked, instructing civic bodies to “pick up dogs from all localities and shift them to far-off places” without delay, even if it meant setting aside existing rules for the time being.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that a relocation site had been identified in Delhi, but the plan was stalled after animal rights activists secured a stay order. The bench expressed strong displeasure, questioning whether activists could “bring back those who have fallen prey to rabies.” The judges emphasised that “streets must be made completely free of stray dogs” and ruled out any adoption of strays for now.
Authorities in Delhi NCR — including the national capital, Noida, Ghaziabad, and Gurugram — have been ordered to construct dog shelters staffed with trained professionals for sterilisation and vaccination. The court also mandated CCTV installation at these facilities to ensure the animals are not released, along with a public helpline for reporting dog bite cases.
“All stray dogs, whether sterilised or not, must be rounded up,” the bench said, adding that civic bodies could create a dedicated task force for the operation.
Mr Mehta backed the court’s stand, stating, “We cannot sacrifice our children just because of a few dog lovers.” The bench further cautioned that anyone attempting to hinder the process would be held in contempt of court.
Read More: India Enacts Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 2025 to Strengthen Maritime Trade Framework
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.
