Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTITC Reversal Dispute Involving Expired Drugs: Gujarat High Court Issues Notice To...

ITC Reversal Dispute Involving Expired Drugs: Gujarat High Court Issues Notice To Govt.

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has issued notice in a significant case involving Eris Lifesciences Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging a demand order for reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework related to returned and expired medicines/drugs.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice Pranav Trivedi issued the notice to the GST department on August 5, 2025, returnable on September 18, 2025. 

The pharma company, Eris Lifesciences is contesting a tax demand of Rs. 1.28 crore raised against it for ITC claims on expired drugs returned by distributors and subsequently destroyed.

The core of the dispute lies in the interpretation and application of Section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act, 2017, which bars ITC on goods “lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples.” The authorities applied this clause to deny ITC on expired drugs returned to Eris, even though the goods had been originally sold with GST duly paid.

The pharma company has argued that the returned goods (expired pharmaceutical products) were sold in the regular course of business and were subject to output GST at the time of original supply. Upon return due to expiry, the drugs were mandatorily destroyed following the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) guidelines. The destruction of the drugs was a regulatory requirement, not a voluntary act of disposal by the company. The issuance of credit notes for the expired goods occurred beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 34(2) of the CGST Act, and therefore, the provision of Section 17(5)(h) should not apply retroactively.

Additionally, the company has challenged the validity of clause (d) of Para 3(B) of Notification No. 72/46/2018-GST dated October 26, 2018, as being ultra vires to the GST Act when applied in such circumstances.

The High Court has allowed direct service of notice through email to expedite proceedings. The case will be taken up next on September 18, 2025.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S Eris Lifesciences Ltd. Versus Union Of India & Ors.

Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 10773 Of 2025

Date:   05/08/2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Jagrat B Shah

Counsel For Respondent:  Pradip D Bhate

Read More: Know Kishori Lal Appointed As Technical Member, GST Appellate Tribunal: Know Him

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...

One-to-One Input-Export Correlation Not Required: CESTAT Quashes Recovery of Cenvat Refund

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Advance Authorisation Exemption Valid and Dept. Failed to Prove Imports Were Wind-Turbine Castings: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...

One-to-One Input-Export Correlation Not Required: CESTAT Quashes Recovery of Cenvat Refund

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...