Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeColumns“No UPI, Only Cash”: Why Bengaluru’s Small Shops Are Turning Away from...

“No UPI, Only Cash”: Why Bengaluru’s Small Shops Are Turning Away from Digital Payments

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Fear of GST notices pushes vendors back to cash transactions as digital payments attract tax scrutiny. 

In a surprising shift from its digital-first reputation, many small businesses across Bengaluru are reverting to cash-only transactions, replacing familiar QR code stickers with handwritten signs that read “No UPI, only cash.”

Street vendors, pushcart sellers, and small shopkeepers who once welcomed Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions are now increasingly refusing digital payments. The reason? A growing fear of scrutiny from tax authorities.

Many of these micro-entrepreneurs have received goods and services tax (GST) notices, some demanding payments running into lakhs of rupees. According to vendors and professionals assisting them, the surge in digital transactions has brought them under the tax department’s radar — often without their knowledge that they had crossed the mandatory registration threshold under GST.

As per current GST regulations, businesses supplying goods must register and pay taxes if their annual turnover exceeds ₹40 lakh, while the limit for service providers stands at ₹20 lakh. Authorities have issued notices based on UPI transaction data since 2021-22, claiming that in many cases, the receipts indicated a turnover above the prescribed threshold.

However, experts point out that not all money received via payment apps reflects business income. Personal transfers, informal loans, and even family contributions often get mixed with business payments, making the total appear inflated. There are concerns that tax demands have been raised without sufficient investigation or proof, putting the onus of clarification entirely on small business owners.

The fear of harassment and potential eviction by local authorities has led to widespread anxiety, prompting many to avoid digital transactions altogether. Several chartered accountants believe Bengaluru could become a model for similar crackdowns across other Indian states, given the pressure on state governments to boost tax collections.

With mounting welfare commitments and infrastructure needs, Karnataka’s tax machinery is under pressure to meet ambitious revenue targets. In this context, small vendors find themselves caught between financial survival and regulatory compliance — choosing to step back from digital platforms that once promised ease, transparency, and inclusion.

Read More: Fresh Plea For Provisional Release Despite GST Confiscation Proceedings Allowed: Kerala High Court 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere Purity, Domestic Courier Transport Insufficient to Establish Gold Smuggling: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

TDS Paid From Own Funds Not Part of Taxable Value: CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand on Wrong Rate

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 22.49 Lakh Excise Duty Demand on Motor Vehicle Cabin Manufacturer Over Customer-Supplied Drawings

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Insurance Premium Collected and Remitted to Insurer Not Taxable as Part of Microfinance Company’s Service Value: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Mere Purity, Domestic Courier Transport Insufficient to Establish Gold Smuggling: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

TDS Paid From Own Funds Not Part of Taxable Value: CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand on Wrong Rate

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 22.49 Lakh Excise Duty Demand on Motor Vehicle Cabin Manufacturer Over Customer-Supplied Drawings

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...