HomeIndirect TaxesBombay High Court Directs Processing of Duty Drawback Claims After Revocation of...

Bombay High Court Directs Processing of Duty Drawback Claims After Revocation of ICEGATE Alert

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has disposed of a writ petition after being informed that the “alert” earlier inserted in the Indian Customs Electronic Commerce/Electronic Data Interchange (EC/EDI) Gateway (ICEGATE) system against a Petitioner’s Importer Exporter Code (IEC) has been revoked by the authorities. 

The bench of Justice M. S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain have directed the department to process the Petitioner’s eligible duty drawback claims within four weeks, in accordance with law. 

The Petitioner, Prime Home Collection (OPC) Pvt Ltd.  had approached the court challenging the insertion of the alert, which had led to a halt in the processing of their eligible duty drawback claims.

During the hearing, the department informed the court that the alert had been removed and no further restrictions were in place on the Petitioner’s IEC. The court took note of this statement and observed that the primary relief sought by the Petitioner had now been addressed.

Since the pending duty drawback claims had not been processed due to the alert, the Court directed the concerned authorities to now process the eligible claims within four weeks, strictly in accordance with law and on their own merits.

The High Court concluded the matter, disposing of the petition without awarding any costs, and instructed all authorities to act upon the authenticated copy of the order.

Case Details

Case Title: Prime Home Collection (OPC) Pvt Ltd. Versus Union of India & Ors.

Case No.: Writ Petition No.14230 Of 2024 

Date:  8 July 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Dr. Sujay Kantawala 

Counsel For Respondent: Jitendra B. Mishra

Read More: Bombay High Court Upholds ED’s Powers Under PMLA Despite Repeal of IPC

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Disposal Of Mining Overburden By Entity Authorised By Mining Lease Holder Constitutes Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

CESTAT Upholds Rs. 20.65 Crore Customs Duty Demand After Brass Scrap Imports Found to Originate From Pakistan, Not UAE

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

Prolonged Incarceration Can Override PMLA’s Stringent Bail Conditions: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that prolonged pre-trial incarceration, coupled with...

Is S. 122(1A) of CGST Act Applicable On Individuals? Bombay High Court Suspends GST Penalty Against Former Director

The Bombay High Court has granted interim protection to a former director of a...

More like this

Disposal Of Mining Overburden By Entity Authorised By Mining Lease Holder Constitutes Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

CESTAT Upholds Rs. 20.65 Crore Customs Duty Demand After Brass Scrap Imports Found to Originate From Pakistan, Not UAE

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

Prolonged Incarceration Can Override PMLA’s Stringent Bail Conditions: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that prolonged pre-trial incarceration, coupled with...