Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesWoman Alleges Gold Confiscated By Customs Without Furnishing Documents; Kerala HC Allows...

Woman Alleges Gold Confiscated By Customs Without Furnishing Documents; Kerala HC Allows Instalment Relief

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has allowed a Thrissur woman, Rasheeda Muthu Abdulrahiman, to remit a penalty of Rs. 2.7 lakh in six monthly instalments.

The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. passed the order after the petitioner, initially seeking multiple remedies including the return of seized gold and quashing of the confiscation order, confined her plea to seeking an instalment facility to pay the penalty due to severe financial hardship.

The petitioner had accused customs officials of confiscating her gold ornaments without furnishing key documents, including the seizure mahazar and her Section 108 statement, essential for mounting a proper defence.

The gold seized in 2022 has reportedly already been sold by customs authorities in an auction, a fact that further intensified the petitioner’s grievance. She contended that the impugned order dated June 12, 2023, was passed without following due process, violating her right to a fair hearing.

While the High Court refrained from addressing the merits of the confiscation or the alleged denial of documents, it acknowledged the petitioner’s financial difficulties and granted her time-bound relief.

The court directed that the penalty amount be paid in six equal instalments of Rs.2,70,000 in six monthly instalments starting July 10, 2025, with subsequent payments due on the 10th of every following month. Any default will cancel the benefit and revive recovery proceedings.

Case Details

Case Title: Rasheeda Muthu Abdulrahiman Versus Joint Commissioner Of Customs

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 20549 OF 2025

Date: 10/06/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Renjith B.Marar

Counsel For Respondent: Arun Kumar.P

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

More like this

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...