Rajasthan High Court Suo Moto Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against RUHS Over Withheld Affiliation for Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences

Date:

The Rajasthan High Court has initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS) for failing to grant affiliation to the Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences despite a previous court order.

The Single Bench of Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur took strong exception to RUHS’s inaction, stating that the university had failed to comply with the court’s directive issued on August 27, 2024. The court noted that the petitioner institution had met all eligibility criteria and that the university’s refusal to grant affiliation was arbitrary and unjustified.

The bench observed, “The respondent RUHS is bent upon harassing the petitioner-institution without any valid reason. This is a fit case for suo-motu contempt proceedings.”

The Saloni Institute of Medical Sciences had filed a writ petition demanding further rounds of B.Sc. Nursing admissions for the 2024-25 session, permission to admit students directly in case of vacant seats. Allocation of students by the Private Federation to ensure full occupancy. Grant of affiliation for the academic session 2024-25 and beyond.

Despite clear court orders favoring the petitioner, RUHS failed to act, leading to unnecessary financial and academic losses for the institute.

The court emphasized that RUHS’s inaction had caused five vacant seats at the petitioner’s institution, resulting in financial damage. The university’s delay in listing the institution for counseling rounds was deemed a deliberate attempt to obstruct its operations.

The High Court has directed the Registrar of RUHS to appear and provide an explanation for the non-compliance. A contempt notice has been issued, and the matter is scheduled for hearing on March 25, 2025.

Case Details

Case Title: Saloni Institute Of Medical Sciences Versus The State Of Rajasthan

Case No.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1480/2025

Date: 25/02/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Shreyansh Mardia

Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Mahendra Bishnoi

Read More: Digital Transformation of Justice: Integrating AI in Indian Judiciary and Law Enforcement 

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

ITAT Quashes Assessment and Penalty Orders Passed During IBC Admission Period

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...

Know The New Finance Secretary, Ajay Seth

The Government of India has designated Shri Ajay Seth,...

Step-Siblings Are Relatives, Gift Not Taxable Under Section 56(2) of Income Tax Act: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...

Economic Affairs Secretary Ajay Seth Designated As New Finance Secretary

The Government of India has designated Shri Ajay Seth,...