HomeIndirect Taxes'Samsung Galaxy Ring' Imported Into India Classifiable As "Other Instruments, Appliances And...

‘Samsung Galaxy Ring’ Imported Into India Classifiable As “Other Instruments, Appliances And Machines”, And Not Imitation Jewellery: CAAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs Authority of Advance Ruling (CAAR) has held that ‘Samsung Galaxy Ring’ imported into India classifiable as “other instruments, appliances and machines”, and not imitation jewellery.

The bench of Samar Nanda has observed that ‘Sizing kit’ imported into India would merit classification under HSN: 9031 as Measuring or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not included elsewhere.

The applicant, Samsung India Electronics Private Limited is a Company incorporated in India. The Applicant intends to import ‘Samsung Galaxy Ring’ and Sizing Kit’ in India for further sale. 

No processing whatsoever would be carried out on the imported goods, post importation into India. 

Samsung Galaxy Ring is a small wearable device primarily designed in the shape of a ring that offers health and wellness tracking. The Applicant as well as the product brochure of Samsung Galaxy Ring’ advertises the product as a ‘Smart Ring’ which gives a personalized health experience to its users. 

The personalized health experience comprises tracking and monitoring health, fitness and sleep-related information such as Heart rate measurement, oxygen saturation, menstrual cycle, skin temperature, sleep monitoring, step count, automatic exercise recognition (walking, running) etc. 

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether the ‘Samsung Galaxy Ring’ imported into India would merit classification under HSN: 7117 as Imitation Jewellery; or HSN: 9018 as Electro-diagnostic apparatus (including apparatus for functional exploratory examinations or for checking physiological parameters); or HSN 9031 as Measuring or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not included elsewhere; or HSN: 8517 as apparatus for transmission of or reception of speech or other sounds, images or other data between two points by variation of an electric current or optical wave flowing in a wired network or by electro-magnetic waves in a wireless network.

Yet another issue raised was whether the ‘Sizing kit’ imported into India would merit classification under HSN: 9031 as Measuring or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not included elsewhere.

The AAR ruled that the  ‘Samsung Galaxy Ring’ is precisely covered under CTH 90318000 – “Other instruments, appliances and machines.” under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

The AAR held that ‘Sizing kit’ is precisely covered under CTH 90318000 under Customs TariffAct, 1975.

Read More: Seizing Authority Failed To Prove Tax Evasion Intention: Allahabad High Court Quashes Detention Order 

Ruling Details

Applicant Name: Samsung India Electronics Private Limited

Date:24.12.2024

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

No Writ in GST Refund Rejection; Assessee Must Approach GSTAT: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere in a GST refund dispute filed...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...