HomeGSTArrest Under GST: Supreme Court Acknowledges Allegations Of Coercion By Officials For...

Arrest Under GST: Supreme Court Acknowledges Allegations Of Coercion By Officials For GST Payments

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court on Thursday observed that there is some merit in allegations that tax officials have been coercing individuals into paying Goods and Services Tax (GST) under the threat of arrest. The Court made this observation based on data presented before it while hearing a batch of petitions concerning the powers of arrest under the GST Act and the Customs Act.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, Justice MM Sundresh, and Justice Bela Trivedi emphasized that taxpayers who feel pressured into making payments can seek relief by approaching the writ court. The Court also directed that officials engaging in coercion must be subjected to departmental action.

“We have examined data regarding allegations of force and coercion in tax payments. There appears to be some merit in these claims. If any person feels compelled to pay, they can approach the writ court for redress. Additionally, officers involved in such actions must be dealt with departmentally. This practice cannot be allowed as it is contrary to the law. We have referred to the Nandini Satpathy case in this regard,” CJI Sanjiv Khanna stated while delivering the verdict.

The Court’s observations highlight concerns over the misuse of enforcement powers under the GST framework, prompting calls for greater accountability within tax departments.

Case Details

Case Title: Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors.

Case No. : W.P.(Crl.) No. 336/2018 (and connected matters).

Read More: BNSS/CrPC Protections for Arrested Persons Apply to GST & Customs Acts: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 27 July, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 27, 2026.GSTDEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but...

IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint

The Supreme Court has clarified that the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the...

Courts Can’t Impose Impractical Conditions That Frustrate Investigation: Supreme Court Relaxes Police Custody Restrictions

The Supreme Court has held that while safeguards against custodial abuse are essential, courts...

DEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but Not Eligible ITC Under TNVAT: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that while Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) licences qualify...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 27 July, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 27, 2026.GSTDEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but...

IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint

The Supreme Court has clarified that the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the...

Courts Can’t Impose Impractical Conditions That Frustrate Investigation: Supreme Court Relaxes Police Custody Restrictions

The Supreme Court has held that while safeguards against custodial abuse are essential, courts...