HomeGSTCalcutta High Court Directs Restoration Of GST Registration Cancelled Due To Non-Filing...

Calcutta High Court Directs Restoration Of GST Registration Cancelled Due To Non-Filing Of Return

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has directed the restoration of GST registration cancelled due to non-filing of return.

The bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj has set aside the orders by both the concerned authorities and by directing the respondent CGST/WBGST authority to restore the petitioner’s registration and open the portal for a period of 45 days from date of communication of the order to enable the petitioner to make the payment of revenue due as well as any other due including penalty to be indicated by the respondent authority concerned within a period of 15 working days.

The main issue involved in this writ petition relates to the cancellation of petitioner’s registration on the ground of non-filing of return. 

The petitioner/assessee submitted that after the cancellation of its registration, it has paid all the revenue due and further agrees to pay any revenue due which is required to be paid for restoring its registration and relies on a judgement dated 09.04.2024 passed by the Chief Justice and the Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya.

The court while directing the restoration of the GST registration, stated that if the petitioner fails to make the payment of revenue due after indication of the amount by the GST authority, the respondent authority concerned shall be free to block the portal again and cancel the registration.

Case Details

Case Title: Debashish Das Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Case No.: WPA 30090 of 2024

Date: 31.01.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Avi Dey, Mr. Siddhartha Dasgupta

Counsel For Respondent: Smarjit Roychowdhury Mr. Amal Kumar Datta

Read More: Sun Pharma Eligible For Refund Of Excess TDS, Delhi High Court Declares CBDT Para. Citing Limitation As Ultra Vires

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court examined the scope of the Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance...

Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that injuries caused by a falling roadside tree branch...

Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order

The Supreme Court has held that courts must prioritize the welfare, dignity, emotional security...

Fresh SCN Mandatory Before Punishment if Misconduct is Proved Through De Novo Proceedings After Defective Inquiry: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that where a departmental inquiry is found defective and...

More like this

Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court examined the scope of the Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance...

Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that injuries caused by a falling roadside tree branch...

Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order

The Supreme Court has held that courts must prioritize the welfare, dignity, emotional security...